Removal of artificial dental calculus by use of conventional and diamond ultrasound tips.
Introduction: Periodontal disease is considered a public health problem and may lead to serious complications as the general health of patient. The main therapeutic procedure is scaling and root planing, which can be performed by a variety of techniques and instruments
Objective:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the removal of calculus, produced artificially, by using a conventional ultrasonic tip and a diamond – CVD tip.
Method: The calculus was produced with artificial sawdust and glue-based cyanoacrylate and distributed in twenty areas also standardized on two plates of acrylic resin (chemical activated), holding 10 samples per plate. Standards / samples were divided by lot into two simple groups, being A (treated with conventional tip) and B (treated with CVD tip).
Results:The treatment in Group A, promoted an average area of 20.48 ± 4.20 mm2 free of artificial calculus which is significantly higher (p <0.05) than the area removed in Group B (15.37 ± 5.29 mm2).
Conclusion:The results showed that the conventional tip presented higher results than CVD tip for efficacy in the removal of calculus.
 Armitage GC, Svanberg GK, Löe H. Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels. Journal of Clinical Periodontology; 1977. 4:173-190.
 Hunter RK, O'Leary TJ, Kafrawy AH. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing. J Periodontol; 1984.55:697-703.
 Riesco MG, Campos Júnior, A. Evaluation of the inflammatory potential of human roots with periodontal disease after manual and ultrasonic scraping. Rev. FOB; 1995. 3:39-43.
 Leon LE, Vogel RI. A comparison of the effectiveness of hand scaling and ultrasonic debridement in furcations as evaluated by differential dark-field microscopy.J Periodontol; 1987.58:86-94.
 Ribeiro EDP, Bittencourt S, Zanatta G, Sallum EA, Nociti Jr FH, Casati MZ. Manual instrumentation X ultrasonic. Revista Periodontia; 2004. Set 13-17.
 Oosterwaal PJM, Matee MI, Mikx FHM. The effect of subgingival debridement with hand and ultrasonic instruments on the subgingival microflora. J Clin. Periodontol; 1987.14:528-533.
 Boretti G, Zappa U, Graf H, Case D. Short-term effects of phase therapy on crevicular cell populations. J Periodontol; 1995. Mar 66(3):235-40.
 Garnick JJ, Dent J. A scanning electron micrographical study of root surfaces and subgingival bacteria after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation J. Periodontol; 1989. Aug 60:441-7.
 Dragoo MR. A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instrumentson subgingival debridement. Part I. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts. Int. J Periodont Rest Dent; 1992.12:311-323.
 Caneppele TMF, Silva AA, Agra CM, Vieira GF. Comparative study of the cutting efficiency of conventional diamond tips and CVD diamond technology and surface roughness with the use of these instruments. Rev. Inst.Ciênc. Saúde; 2007. 25(3): 271-7.
 Penteado LAM, Auto VC, Penteado RAPM. In vitro evaluation of tactile sensitivity and resistance to instrumentation in the removal of artificial dental stones - pilot study. R. Periodontia; 2010. 20(01);54-60.
 Alves RV, Machion L, Cassati MZ, Sallum EA, Sallum AW. Changes in depth of probing after scraping with different instruments. 6 week follow up. Odontologia Clin.Cientif. Recife; 2003. 2 (3): 187-190.
 Checci L, Pelliccioni GA. Hand Versus ultrassonic instrumentation in the removal of endotoxins from root surfacesin vitro. J. Periodontal. 1988; 59: 398-402. apud Gomes IS. Avaliação da superfície radicular após raspagem com pontas convencionais e CVD em ultrassom: Análise em rugosímetro.Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2008. São José dos Campos.
 Breininger DR et al. Comparative effectiveness of ultrassonican hand scaling for the removal of subgengival plaque and calculus.J. Periodontal. 1986: 58: 9-18. apud Gomes IS. Evaluation of the root surface after scraping with conventional tips and CVD on ultrasound: Rugosimeter analysis. Paulista State University; 2008. São José dos Campos.
 Schlageter L, Rateitschak-Pluss EM, Schwarz JP. Root surfaces moothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study.J ClinPeriodontol;1996. May 23(5):460-4 apud Gomes IS. Evaluation of the root surface after scraping with conventional tips and CVD on ultrasound: Rugosimeter analysis. Paulista State University 2008. São José dos Campos.
 Chan YK, Needleman IG, Clifford LR. Comparison of four methods of assessing root surface debridement. J. Periodontol; 2000; 71(03).
 Martins AG, Dantas ACAM, Pinto GR, Suaid F,NocitiFH,Sallum Júnior AW. Evaluation of the root surface after scraping with conventional tips and CVD on ultrasound: Rugosimeter analysis. Paulista State University. R.Periodontia;2007. 17(4).
 Silva Filho WLS, Paullillo LAMS, Nociti Júnior FH, Sallum EA, Casati MZ, Sallum AW. Comparative evaluation of root surface roughness treated with curettes, ultrasonic tips and ultrasonic diamond tips - In vitro study. Revista de Periodontia; 2007.17(01).
 Khosravi M, Bahrami ZS, Atabaki MSJ, Shokrgozar MA, Shokri F. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.J Clin.Periodontol 2004; 31: 160–165.
 Gomes IS. Evaluation of the root surface after scraping with conventional tips and CVD on ultrasound: Rugosimeter analysis. Paulista State University 2008.São José dos Campos.
 Grecco JAP, Holanda MC, Solis ACO. Comparison of manual and ultrasonic scraping in the furcation region. Faculty of Health Sciences (FCS) University of Vale do Paraíba (UNIVAP). [Access 15 May 2011]. Available in: http://www.inicepg.univap.br/cd/INIC_2007/trabalhos/saude/inic/INICG00496_01O.pdf.
 Silva Filho WLS. Clinical evaluation of the use of ultrasonic diamond tips
Copyright policies & self-archiving
We are a RoMEO green journal.
Author's Pre-print: author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
Author's Post-print: author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing)
Publisher's Version/PDF: author can archive publisher's version/PDF
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Articles are published Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ©