Pregnant Women Positioning in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Integrative Review
Objective: to analyze the scientific evidence on the positioning of pregnant women in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
Method: an integrative review of the literature in the Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS and PubMed databases using the descriptors "patient positioning", "spinal anesthesia" and "obstetrics" and their synonyms "patient position" and "spinal anesthetics".
Results: the sample of 8 articles showed that the fastest onset of blockade in pregnant women occurs in the lateral horizontal decubitus position and in the sitting position with legs downwards. Lateral decubitus with elevated head presented insufficient blockade. Lateral position was related to greater comfort, and its maintenance for 15 minutes before the supine position, after infiltration with the anesthetic was associated with lower incidence of hypotension.
Conclusion: Scientific evidence has shown that positioning influences the effect, potentiation and delay of anesthesia, comfort and the pregnant woman's blood pressure, being relevant to the perioperative and obstetric multidisciplinary practice.
2. WHO. WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. World Health Organization, 2015.
3. Dourado AD, Filho RLML, Fernandes RAML, Gondim MCS, Nogueira EVM. Sufentanil in combination with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2016; 66(6): 622-7.
4. John M, John R, Gupta S. The obstetric spinal: why sit when you can lie?. Br J Hosp Med (London). 2011; 72(12): 718.
5. Miranda AB, Fogaça AR, Rizzetto M, Lopes LCC. Surgical positioning: nursing care in the transoperative period. Rev SOBECC. 2016; 21(1): 52-8.
6. Ursi ES, Galvão CM. Prevenção de lesão de pele no período perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2006; 14(1): 124-31.
7. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2005. Making the case for evidence-based practice; p. 3-24.
8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9.
9. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Humanização do parto e do nascimento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
10. Minayo MCS. Scientificity, generalization and dissemination of qualitative studies. 2017; 22(1): 16-17.
11. Silva EL, Rodrigues FRA. La seguridad del enfermo y los procesos sociales en relación con enfermeros en el contexto de la sala de operaciones. Revista de Enfermería e Humanidades Cultura de los cuidados. 2016; 46:135-45.
12. Riegel F, Junior NJO. Processo de enfermagem: implicações para a segurança do paciente em centro cirúrgico. Cogitare Enferm. 2017; 22(4): 01-05.
13. Pimenta AL, Souza ML. The professional identity of nursing in the papers published by REBEN. Texto & Contexto Enferm. 2017; 26(1):e4370015.
14. Singh VK, Yadav RRS, Verma S. Use of Different Sizes of Head- Ring for Positioning During Induction of Anaesthesia in Paediatric Spine Surgeries. J Clinic Diagnost Research. 2016; 10(5): UL01.
15. Upadya M, Saneesh PJ. Anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Indian J Anaesth. 2016; 60(4): 234-41.
16. Oliveira TR, Louzada LAL, Jorge JC. Raquianestesia: prós e contras. Rev Med Minas Gerais. 2015; 25(Supl 4): S28-S35.
17. Kundra P, Arunsekar G, Vasudevan A, Vinayagam S, Habeebullah S, Ramesh A. Effect of postural changes on inferior vena cava dimensions and its influence on haemodynamics during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 35(7): 667-71.
Copyright policies & self-archiving
We are a RoMEO green journal.
Author's Pre-print: author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
Author's Post-print: author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing)
Publisher's Version/PDF: author can archive publisher's version/PDF
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Articles are published Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ©